Rubriques
- Biographie (2)
- Catalogue plasticien (25)
- Central St Martin's (12)
- Cover (1)
- Expositions (2)
- Fragment de pylone (15)
- Illustrations (3)
- Machines (16)
- Mémoire d'études (2)
- Mon atelier (1)
- Photographies (3)
- Presse (1)
- Projets Éducatifs (2)
- Scénographies (1)
- Symphonie graphique (9)
- Vous voulez contacter Anne ... (2)
mardi 22 décembre 2015
Nico's triptyque
Descriptif de l'oeuvre d'Anne Chomicki :
TriptyqueAcrylique sur toile
3x 164x30cm
Année 2014
Photo de François Fernandez
Protector man
Descriptif de l'oeuvre d'Anne Chomicki :
Acrylique sur toile
80x80 cm
Année 2014
Photo de François Fernandez
Le penseur
Descriptif de l'oeuvre d'Anne Chomicki :
Acrylique sur toile
80x80 cm
Année 2014
Photo de François Fernandez
Acrylique sur toile
80x80 cm
Année 2014
Photo de François Fernandez
Symphonie DO
Descriptif de l'oeuvre d'Anne Chomicki :
Acrylique sur toile
60 x 60 cm
Année 2013
Photo de François Fernandez
Symphonie RE
Descriptif de l'oeuvre d'Anne Chomicki :
Acrylique sur toile
60 x 60 cm
Année 2013
Photo de François Fernandez
Symphonie MI
Descriptif de l'oeuvre d'Anne Chomicki :
Acrylique sur toile
60x60 cm
Année 2013
Photo de François Fernandez
Symphonie FA
Descriptif de l'oeuvre d'Anne Chomicki :
Acrylique sur toile
60 x 60 cm
Année 2013
Photo de François Fernandez
Moi & Soi
Descriptif de l'oeuvre d'Anne Chomicki :
Acrylique sur toile
2x 20x80 cm
Année 2013
Photo de François Fernandez
Cat Walk
Descriptif de l'oeuvre d'Anne Chomicki :
Acrylique sur toile
60 x 60 cm
Année 2011
Photo de François Fernandez
Hydraulique
Descriptif de l'oeuvre d'Anne Chomicki :
Peinture acrylique sur papier mâché en 3 dimensions
80x80 cm
Année 2011
Photo de François Fernandez
Rencontres
Descriptif de l'oeuvre d'Anne Chomicki :
Acrylique sur toile
60 x 60 cm
Année 2011
Photo de François Fernandez
Micro-Mega 2
Descriptif de l'oeuvre d'Anne Chomicki :
Acrylique sur toile
80x80 cm
Année 2013
Photo de François Fernandez
Acrylique sur toile
80x80 cm
Année 2013
Photo de François Fernandez
Matrice 2
Descriptif de l'oeuvre d'Anne Chomicki :
Acrylique sur toile
80x80 cm
Année 2013
Photo de François Fernandez
Acrylique sur toile
80x80 cm
Année 2013
Photo de François Fernandez
Petit jetté
Descriptif de l'oeuvre d'Anne Chomicki :
Acrylique sur toile
30x30 cm
Année 2013
Photo de François Fernandez
Rasta Star
Descriptif de l'oeuvre d'Anne Chomicki :
Acrylique sur toile
100 x 100 cm
Année 2013
Photo de François Fernandez
Pyraminoïde
Descriptif de l'oeuvre d'Anne Chomicki :
Acrylique sur toile
100 x 100 cm
Année 2011
Photo de François Fernandez
Ici & maintenant 2
Descriptif de l'oeuvre d'Anne Chomicki :
Acrylique sur toile
100 x 100 cm
Année 2013
Photo de François Fernandez
Clown Face
Descriptif de l'oeuvre d'Anne Chomicki :
Acrylique sur toile
100 x 100 cm
Année 2013
Photo de François Fernandez
samedi 19 décembre 2015
Participation au site fmpv.net
Photo montage de Jean-Marc Angelini |
Participation par des illustrations pour le site de l'écrivain Jean-Louis Layrac, fmpv.net - St Jeannet (06) / 2015
samedi 5 décembre 2015
THE AERIAL AND TERRESTRIAL IMAGINATION IN THE WORK OF JOAN MIRO Part 1
THE AERIAL AND TERRESTRIAL IMAGINATION IN THE WORK OF
JOAN MIRO
MIRO’S
WORK VERSUS THE PREHISTORIC ROCK ENGRAVINGS OF MONT BEGO
By Anne-Laurence CHOMICKI
“More
than Painting itself, what really does count is what it throws into the air,
what it spreads. It is not important if the painting is destroyed. Art can die,
what does count, it ‘s that it had spread its germ on earth.”
(Joan
Miro, 1893-1983)
CONTENTS
1. INTRODUCTION
2. MIRO’S RELASHIONSHIPS TO THE SURREALIST
MOVEMENT AND TO THE PRIMITIVE
3. MIRO’S SIGNS LIST / MONT BEGO’S ENGRAVED
SIGNS LIST
4. MONT BEGO
A.
Geographical
and geological surroundings and history of the rock engravings
B.
Geology
and engraving techniques
C.
The
mountain and its symbolism
5. THE EARTH / SKY RELATIONSHIPS
A.
In
the work of Joan Miro and the rupestrian engravings of Mont Bego
B.
Steles
comparated to Miro’s few paintings
6. MIRO AND THE EARTH
A.
In
the painting
B.
In
the sculpture
C.
The
bull
7. MIRO AND THE SKY
8. BETWEEN SKY AND EARTH : THE SCALE OF EVASION
CONCLUSION
BIBLIOGRAPHY
“Valley of the wonders”
1. INTRODUCTION
The famous European sites of Lascaux in France and
Altamira in Spain abound in upper Palaeolithic Parietal art. The arrangement of thousands of painted and
engraved figures, beyond a mere aesthetic purpose, seems profoundly motivated
by the wish to ostentatiously express a certain metaphysical representation of
Prehistoric man. But I could not limit
myself to the realism of animal paintings on frescos; in addition I was
profoundly attracted by the concise and schematic representation which appears
at the Neolithic age at this site which is two hours away from the fantastic
site of the ‘Vallée des Merveilles’ (Valley of Wonders) where the engravers of
Mont Bégo left a mine of treasures some 3,500 years ago. Beyond authentic art I saw in the rock
engravings a kind of cultural language; a rough graphic order composed of
geometric tracing which symbolises perfectly a reality which demonstrates the
constituents of the daily routine at the time.
The variety is amazing; yokes, agricultural tools,
weapons, funny little figures armed with long pikes, wheels, mysterious lines,
enclosures studded with what seem to be numerous stars and masses of horned
animals, all of which are reminiscent of Joan Miró’s pantomime art.
Could this message engraved in the rock by these mountain
populations be compared to the last works of the artist? The tracing of a horizon line as a frontier
between heaven and earth, next to which Miró wrote, as a tribute to his first
master ‘ If in three thousand years one
comes across my paintings, I’d hope one would understand that I helped to
liberate not only painting, but also man’s consciousness.’
Is Miró consciously interpreting these symbols in his
work? Mircea Eliade compared Miró’s art
with primitive images, such as the above rock engravings and says of the 1927
painting entitled ‘Paysage et lièvre’,
(Landscape and Hare) :
Miró’s hare, symbol of life,
looks at how the spiral unwinds in concentric circles between earth and sky in
order to dive finally in celestial light, an energy moving about between matter
and spirit. (L’univers fantastique des mythes – The fantastic Universe of
Myths)
In the transmission of a universal message, Miró
demonstrates his relationship with the pre-artistic origin of are beyond every
ideology, every theory and even every pictorial aesthetic.
My research, comparing archaeology to Miró’s Marvellous has been as exciting an
adventure as that of my return to the site so appropriately names ‘des
Merveilles’.
1. MIRÓ’S
RELATIONSHIP WITH THE SURREALIST MOVEMENT AND TO THE PRIMITIVE
‘I did like Surrealism because Surrealists
did not consider painting as an end. A picture must be fruitful. It has to create a world.’ (Joan Miró, in XXᵉ siècle, 1959)
The time and place that heralded the germ of Surrealism
which was planted by Max Ernst and André Breton could be assigned to Europe in 1919. Both of them were privy to the same historic
context, and they both refused to accept that which was around them. They preferred instead to think of the coming
of another culture, bearing another history and dedicated their work to forming
a common creation.
Breton studied the process of dreams and cited the
threshold of sleep as the threshold of inspiration. The fundamental experience of Surrealism is
an isolated one, separate from any external conditions, almost as if some God,
visiting the ‘dreamers’ during their sleep, would bring to them ‘the power that
they did not know’ (Aragon), and thus their liberation from the outer world and
common circumstances of time.
These images from half-sleep belong to a hypnotic state,
whereby consciousness is not quite dismissed and as such they have to be
perceived as useable and likely to include a sequel. Surrealism, which hoped to erase the borders
of dream and reality, conscious and unconscious, suggests itself as a link
between the unconscious, which supplies and the consciousness which receives
and exploits.
Freud believed that through dreams, you are able to get a
glimpse into your unconscious, because it is in our dreams that our primal
desires are manifested. The
incongruities in dreams result from a struggle for dominance between the Ego
and the Id. Freud believed that, despite
the overwhelming urge to repress desires, the unconscious reveals itself,
particularly when the conscious mind relaxes its hold, during dreams, odd
patterns of behaviour, slips of the tongue, accident and art. Additionally, Freud believed that myths
revealed psychological fixations and desires that were underlying in every
human being.
Carl Yung suggested that myths, regardless of their
origins, displayed remarkable similarities.
He explained these similarities via the existence of what he called the
‘Collective Unconscious’; a later of the psyche that all of humanity somehow
shares.
Just as dreams contain irrational images that reveal the
psychology of the dreamer, myths reveal the psychology of the whole of
humanity.
Thus, though similar in many ways to his contemporaries,
Joan Miró’s work has provided meaningful imagery which has become a part of our
heritage. Between 1925 and 1927 Miró, considered by Breton as ‘the most
surrealist among us’, created a synthesis in his work, attempting to abolish
the border with the dream world. His
paintings became more and more abstract, so much so that expression was
dictated by irrational stimuli and hypnotic visions. During this period Miró goes beyond the
limits of painting, evoking in his calligraphy the phantasmagorias of the
unconscious (Carnaval d’Arlequin, 1924/5)
stating:
‘In 1925 I used to draw
almost entirely from hallucinations often caused by starvation…’
This autonomous world, a fusion of reality and
imagination entitled ‘Miróland’, possesses its own vocabulary, symbolically
represented through a graphic language, the aim of which was to both come
closer to the original source of art and to lay the foundations of an art of
the origins.
Carnaval d’Arlequin, 1924 - 25
At the stage of symbol formation language is comparable
to primitive thinking. This view of
language had much in common with the Surrealists who also established a new
mode of expression based upon a revitalisation of both form and meaning of
language.
According to Jung language is more than speech, as its
source is the interface between sensory and cognitive expression. Tristan Tzara recognised that ‘non-directed’
thinking dominates primitive mentality and does not separate dream and waking
states. He envisioned a new unity – one
which viewed primal sensibilities with the experience of time and knowledge.
Miró’s art draws extensively from contemporary
conceptions of primitive mentality. He
viewed painting as being (in a state of
decadence since the age of caves.’ He aimed to recapture the essence of
Prehistoric art; ‘to penetrate the
sources, to return to origins.
The ideas of the anthropologist Lucien Levy-Bruhl were of
particular influence to Miró. The poet
Michel Leiris, an ethnographer by profession and one of Miró’s closest friends,
had stated that he, like almost everyone associated with the Surrealist
movement was profoundly affected by Levy-Bruhl’s ideas which suggested that
instead of analysing experiences, the primitive mind responded intuitively and
emotionally. Belief in the omnipresence
of vitalising, mystic forces confirms the realist of all that is seen or
unseen. Dynamic and fluid connections
exist between all things and all beings without the need for time or place.
Levy-Bruhl also stressed that ‘collective
representations’ were central to primitive mental functioning and this
assumption is very close to Miró’s remarks in in XXᵉ siècle, 1959:
‘In order to really become a
man, one has to free oneself from one’s false self. In my case, I have to stop being Miró, i.e.
being a Spanish painter belonging to a society bordered by boundaries, social
and bureaucratic conventions. In other
words, one has to go towards anonymity….. hence the importance of popular art.’
Miró concentrates on the primordial level where the
mystical unity and harmony that underlie all life is revealed. This conclusion is drawn from the very
interesting work of Sidra Stich, assistant professor of Art and Archaeology,
who states in the introduction of his 1980 book ‘Joan Miró; the development of
a sign language.’
‘Joan Miró’s art heralds a
deep grasp of the ‘Marvellous’ (a term chosen by André Breton to denote that
state of being expression which the Surrealists exalted in life and in art.)
Beyond childlike innocence, romantic fantasy and poetic
reverie, ‘Marvellous’ signifies for Miró a cosmic perspective and a focus on
the dynamics of creation. Capturing the mystery and magic of life forces is
central to Miró’s creative approach.
This characterised his method, along with the forms and contents of his
compositions. Although these features
establish Miró as a leading figure within the Surrealist movement and the
Modernist tradition, it is his distinctive adaptation of a primitive impulse,
derived from an interest in prehistoric art and anthropological theories about
‘primitive mentality’, which clarifies the nature and uniqueness of his
artistic contribution.
Thus, the following study sets a symbolic parallel
between the rock engravings of the Vallée des Merveilles and Joan Miró’s art. The current state of the symbolic readings of
these engravings of the Bronze Age, along with their graphic correspondence
with Miró’s work allow us to establish a parallel between the numerous
representations of the cosmic, primordial couple, the principle of duality for Mont
Bégo’s engravers and the pairings of ‘Earth/Sky’, ‘Conscious/Unconscious’ and
‘Reality/Dream’; a major theme within Miró’s work.
1. MIRÓ’S
SIGNS LIST
Ø
The earth’s element as a foundation; sustaining land and a source
of energy
The earth is present
in many works with the horizon line
marking the separation with the sky. Miró’s ground is desert, neatly configured to support the figures, the
animals, the anthropoids or the objects.
Ø
The cosmic, astral element as a receptacle of upward aspirations and of
the inaccessible sky.
The stars and the constellations represent the highest part of his
vocabulary. They remain as the
expression of a spiritual, dematerialised universe.
Sun and Moon have a privileged place and constitute such important
themes that they are often considered as distinctive signs of Miró’s works.
Ø
The anthropomorphic language
This is the most important language system
used by Miró. The ability to communicate
he obtains from this system comes mainly from the phenomenon of deformation,
allowing him to give an intensity to some parts of the anatomy or of an article
of clothing, whilst also allowing him to reduce other parts to almost nothing.
The
full face feminine figures represented
by Miró are bell-shaped, so their legs are not visible. Legs represent motion and therefore are not
compatible with the idols’ impassive receptivity. The powerful and enormous eyes within their round faces define these figures.
The
match men: the male faces are
usually profile.
Ø
Vegetal and animal lexicon
Similar to an ideogram, each element of a
plant became a sign of a species; an olive tree, a pine etc. They later almost disappeared from his works.
Animals
would have a more lasting role
in the artist’s language. The animals
were used to represent earth and sky – the two fundamental types of place –
with earth being represented by the animals nearest to it such as snails, snakes, worms and lizards and
for the sky those animals who fly such as birds,
flies and mosquitos.
Personified
characters and beings
such as horses, dogs, bulls, suns and moons with human faces…..presented within
a formal representation.
Ø
Objects lexicon
The most represented
objects are the portable ones, such as those used in the countryside such as a chair and table, a plate and knife, a plough,
a sickle, a scythe, a bottle, a jar, shoes and a hat.
In amongst the
artificial objects you can also see any other form of visual representation
than that of painting: collages of printed sheets, reproduction of printed
texts, calligraphic texts, musical notes, diagrams and so forth.
Scales which reach the unknown dimensions of the unconscious.
Ø
Geometric shapes; dots, curves, arabesques,
zigzags
MONT BEGO’S ENGRAVED SIGNS LIST
Earth’s elements
- reticulations
defining enclosures and plots of land, symbols of Earth goddesses
Cosmic Elements
- crosses, stars
- circles, spirals,
small eight-spoke wheels interpreted as solar symbols
Anthropomorphic figures
Anthropomorphic ‘corniforms’
and anthropomorphic ‘reticulations’
- ‘Chief of the tribe’, ‘Sorcerer’, ‘Christ’,
‘Dancer’ – all of which were named this way by popular tradition
- small figures,
priests, female sexual representations (Orant
acephal corniform)
Corniforms
- bull’s head and
horns, harnessing
Objects lexicon
- Weapons and tools;
sacrificial dagger, halberds, scythes….
Scales
Geometric shapes
Non representative shapes
- staked surfaces,
lines, zigzags, isolated cupules
Mont Bégo
1. MONT
BEGO
A.
Geographical and geological surroundings and history of the rock engravings
Mont Bégo stands at a height of 2872 metres in the heart
of the archaeological patrimony of the ‘Vallée des Merveilles’ in the Southern
Alps. It is 80km from Nice, my place of
birth, in between the villages of Tende and Saint-Martin-Vésubie. It peaks above high mountain valleys, the
walls of which are worn and polished by glaciers. These valleys enclose imposing chaos
comprised of erratic blocks, moraines, many still and mysterious lakes gathered
behind glacial constrictions and they shelter thousands of rock engravings,
randomly scattered over an area of 14 square km dating from the Bronze Age and
Roman times.
In 1460 the traveller Pierre de Montfort referred for the
first time to the ‘Vallée des Merveilles’ as a ‘diabolic’ place. Since then, numerous archaeologists and
historians have examined the site; in particular it is important to mention the
English botanist M F G S Moggridge, and Emile Rivière who in 1877 dated the
engravings from the Bronze Age. He is
credited with bringing the engravings to the attention of the scientists. In 1879 the English botanist Clarence
Bicknell, as if on a sacred mission, devoted his life and resources to the
discovery of ‘petroglyphs’ and classified them, studying them systematically
and scientifically. He revealed the historic ‘Chief of the Tribe’, the ‘Christ’
and the ‘Sorcerer’. He also founded the
Museum of Liguric Studies in 1888.
Professor Henry de Lulmey dedicated 30 years to reading
this ‘huge stone codex.’ He is currently
completing a monumental monograph in 24 volumes (see MontBego.com) in which he
compares the Bégo engravings with the oldest writing systems of the 2nd
and 3rd millenniums B.C.
‘Like pictograms and ideograms, the ‘begograms’ which reoccur from rock
to rock present numerous variants and can be isolated or associated between
them, in order to make up real stories connected with the myths and the
cosmogony of the earliest metallurgist peoples of the Southern Alps.’
Geology and engraving techniques
Different types of rock, mainly green, orange and purple
schist, could be noticed (see fig 1, 2, 3).
The engravings were generally on smooth walls polished by glaciers, and
rarely on isolated blocks. The engraved
walls are mostly orientated towards east or south east, even in areas where the
natural lean is in another direction. A
large number of engravings, particularly those representing daggers, were
sketched out by a continuous line traced with a fine point (a real dagger
placed on the stone may have been outlined).
Sometimes the outlines of the engravings were traced by
aligning little ‘cupules’ next to each other.
These cupules were then traced with a hard stone on the surface,
probably with a small quartz stone, using pressure and rotation which resulted
in a strong abrasion of the rock.
Observing the engravings reveals 4 main styles of work:
1.
very
small, regular cupules, smooth engraving surface (fig.4)
2.
large
cupules, irregular engraving surface, producing a generally irregular effect
(fig.5)
3.
large
and spaced cupules, producing a very irregular effect (fig.6)
4.
spaced
out and elongated cupules (fig.7)
B. The
mountain and its symbolism
In all primitive religions, the peak, the top, is
perceived as a natural attribute of Divinity.
The Bégo (see footnote), a sacred mountain, would be considered as a
transmission ladder between sky and earth.
It is the residence of the Gods and represents the end of human
ascent. It is the centre of the
world. This concept is omnipresent in
all traditional cultures, particularly in our occidental civilisations, as
proved by a large number of sanctuaries built on high ground.
Ours is quite unique, with its ferrous mount acting as
lightning conductor in the valley, attracting particularly violent summer
thunderstorms. This natural phenomenon
has consecrated Mont Bégo, and if we refer to mythology and to the history of
religion, lightning is God’s weapon and the place he strikes with lightning is
sacred.
Therefore, nothing justifies the permanent presence of
the populations in this site, the altitude of which varies between 2000 and
3000 metres, with such an inhospitable climate.
This is also the opinion of the poet André Verdet, one of Miró’s friends
who describes his experience of staying in this site thus: ‘this place had
brought about a complete disorientation where anxiety and even anguish would
make me enter an unreal dimension.’
Talking about these mountain populations, he comments
‘they chose the surroundings of Mont Bégo to adorn them with engravings and
concentrate their cultural energy there, because they had in themselves an
obscure force that led them towards these sites. This force was nurtured on an atmosphere
favourable to spells that prevailed and still prevail there.’
We have to remember the importance given to the stars
from the very beginning of the Bronze Age amid several cultural elements. For many years man has been looking at the
movement of the sky and the sun. The
phases of the moon and the movement of constellations drew his attention. This sacred place, which opens the gate to
heaven by ascending the highest mountains of the earth, instantly introduces us
into the heaven and earth relationships omnipresent in Miró’s works.
1. THE
EARTH/SKY RELATIONSHIPS
A. In
the work of Joan Miró
‘….Earth, Earth, only
Earth. It’s Earth, the Earth: it’s
something more powerful than me. The fantastic mountains play an important part
in my life, as does the sky…. It’s the shock of shapes on my mind, more than
their vision. It’s the strength that
feeds me. I never felt anywhere else
such a powerful shock as I did in Montroig, it’s the primitive preliminary
shock to which I always go back. (Joan Miró)
Whether examining the earth or the sky with a wondering
eye, Miró always calls out the infinitely great or the infinitesimal, probably
attaching the same importance and meaning to either the one or to the
other. Orders of size do not exist in
his painting, and by giving a priority to the most humble beings and objects he
carefully finds such a perfect order and gains such greatness.
Unlike the Cuban painters in his first works, he closely
analyses, details, but never diverts. He
doesn’t distort in any way what appears to him; he paints the earth – his earth
– the sky, the animals and the figures.
He settles himself in the reality but is already painting in
wonder. He talks about the Catalan soil
on which he was born and for which he has deep-rooted feeling, this very soil
which feeds man according to the rhythms of nature. But soon, shapes will fall over; objects and
figures will move away from each other and azure overwhelms the canvas. Miró adds to all this his own colours of
earth and sky; his universe is lit with new shapes. He draws a line and meets a star, as one
would shout out in space. He defines
another distance.
The beauty of his works, originating new myths, comes
from those two aspects of his nature’ perfectly superimposed and plotting the
same graphic; that of a power capable of reaching high states (Sky/dreams), and
that of an imperious necessity to thoroughly examine and check the pretexts
wherein he satisfies this power (Earth/nature/reality).
During his passing through in the Surrealist movement,
Joan Miró freed himself from any constraint and any school. His terrestrial, solar and lunar universe is
that of a free man, and it is not surprising if this world turned outward has
fascinated his contemporary poet friends – Prévert, Leiris, Eluard, Queneau,
Desnos and Breton, who sought Miró’s contribution in order to bring imaginary
digressions to their writings.
Naissance de Miró
Quand l’oiseau du
jour, tout battant neuf, vint se nicher dance l’arbre des couleurs, Miró goûtait
l’air pur, la campagne, le lait, les troupeaux, les yeux simples et la
tendresse du sein glorieux cueillant la cerise de la bouche.
Nulle aubaine ne
lui fut jamais meilleure qu’un chemin orangé et mauve, des maisons jaunes, des
arbres roses, la terre, en deçà d’un ciel de raisins et d’olives qui trouvera
longtemps les quatre murs de l’ennui……
Premier matin,
dernier matin, le monde commence.
M’isolerai-je pour reroduire plus fidèlement la vie frémissante, le
changement ? Des mots s’attachent à
moi, que je voudrais dehors, au cœur de ce monde innocent qui me parle, qui me
voit, qui m’écoute, et dont Miró reflète, depuis toujours, les plus
transparentes métamorphoses.
Paul Eluard, in ‘Cahiers d’Art’ no 1-3, Paris 1937
In the rupestrian rock
engravings
The primordial divine couple living on Bégo’s sacred
mountain were venerated by the farming populations of the Bronze Age in the
Southern Alps; the Bull God, master of storm, thunderbolt and dispenser of
rain, and the Earth Goddess - male sky and female land - which are present in
many religions. The cult of the
primordial people is clearly represented through a multitude of signs which
were beaten or scratched into the rock.
Archaeologists classified them into different types (refer to the signs
list, section 3).
Steles compared to Miró
Stele, A: ‘The Thunderbolt–armed God and the Earth
Goddess
The Thunderbolt God
Situated at great height, at the foot of the sheer rock
faces of the ‘Rocher des Merveilles’, the engraving entitled ‘Anthropomorph
with zigzag arms’ seems to be the most enigmatic figure at the site. Amongst all the anthropomorphic motifs it
seems the most schematic and only the presence of hands allows a comparison to
the human form. Considering the high
situation of the engraving, this strange figure can be compared to a divine
being.
If we refer to iconographic symbolism, the broken lines
constituting the two arms could evoke water and a thunderbolt as symbolic
representations. (See footnotes)
This motif, represented on the side of the head, is seen
as a big ear towards which an arrow is directed. This arrow is supposed to represent a
sonorous phenomenon; word or song causing vibration which materialises as small
segments of a broken line that can be seen at its base. (See footnotes)
The engraving is composed of
three parts:
- head with a halo (solar symbol)
- linear trunk (symbolising the Pillar or the Cosmic
Tree) with two zigzag arms (thunderbolt symbols)
- the squared motif (symbolising the ploughed field, the
fertilised land) (See footnotes)
This three-part structure, combined in the ‘Anthropomorph
with zigzag arms’ reveals the cosmic man’s power, master of his universe and
initiated, thus able to perceive the world in its subtle state. (See paragraph
D)
The Earth Goddess
The primitive farmers always associate the earth’s
fertility with the creative power of the woman.
Semites, Greeks and Romans used to associate earth and womb.
The comparison between woman and the ploughed land is
found in all European folklore.
The feminine Earth Goddess is represented in
the region of Mont Bégo via the form ‘orant acephal corniform’. In front of the zigzag armed Anthropomorph,
she has raised her arms up in order to receive the seed from the sky. Isn’t it significant that the dispenser of
celestial rain is set on the left, in the direction of the summit of the
mountain, and that the Earth Goddess is engraved on the right, towards the
valley which housed the cultivated fields of the Bronze Age population?
Pomme de terre, 1928
(Potato)
This painting feels familiar to me for a particular
reason. I see significant elements of the 2 main steles of Mont Bégo; the woman
with her arms raised up to the sky, the knife, the scale. The woman herself shelters a swarming life, a
complete world, with a fish, a sun and a black cloud and an inner horizon. Her hand is strongly magnified and is adorned
with an M shaped mark, as if she was wearing the tattoo of her creator’s
monogram.
it
is an image of the Earth-mother in the palm of which the artist finds his
place. He always felt the need to draw a
new energy from this welcoming womb.
Le fermier et sa femme, 1936 (The farmer and his wife)
Miró centres his composition on the horizon line. The familiar figures of the farmer and his
wife are placed here to represent a surprising metamorphosis; giving up the
heavy tread and the age-old gestures that link them to the ground and spreading
their wings- whilst grimacing – in order to meet in the sky the strange insect
that is watching them with an astounded look.
The transformation has already occurred in the couple – the wife has
lost her identity. Only the farmer, on
the left, is defined by gender, albeit somewhat strangely, as if having both
male and female characteristics. It
seems to represent a transition towards dehumanisation through the loss of the
world’s most reliable marks.
Femme at oiseau le soleil, 1942 (Woman and bird in front
of the sun)
Miró again declares man’s yearning for freedom, as it is
found in the flight of a bird or within the celestial sphere. By the rock-hewn surface and upraised arms,
it is clear, however, that man is still earthbound and seeking release. Moreover, the imagery reiterates Miró’s
enduring interest in expressing origins and universal harmony. This is asserted by the progressive
development of primal markings into schematic configurations within the
composition and the clever formal manipulations of sing images.
The keynote is a simple zig-zig, inscribed in the lower
centre of the painting. Suggestively,
this appears a spontaneous, purely graphic pattern, yet it is precisely defined
by black dots at either end and by a series of red dots along its edges. As a result, the zigzag acquires the
semblance of a head, tail and tiny legs.
This configuration is then re-ordered to form a modified,
standing zigzag person craning its head towards a star.
Elsewhere in the composition, Miró recombined and
repeated the seminal calligraphic elements and shapes in order to produce
figures which are virtually personified by signs.
Femme devant le soleil, 1938 (Woman in front of the sun)
The silhouette of a woman stretching upwards, trying to
catch, or maybe receive the energy of the dazzling sun, which is adorned with
tongues of fire. The circle appears in
four instances, linking the stars with the woman’s body, establishing
similarities between them.
Tête de femme, 1938
(Woman’s head)
Miró represents, in a very blunt fashion, another aspect
of the mother-goddess which symbolises the destructive side of man’s
instinctive life. Both aspects of this
archetypal symbol of the Big Mother; the light, fertile aspect and the dark,
destructive one are present as the permanent feature of a psychic conflict from
which the artist draws a creative power.
It is tempting to make a comparison here with the
interpretation of the two opposing daggers on the stele of the Chief of the
Tribe.
Stele B ‘The Chief of the Tribe and the Earth Goddess’
On the ‘corniform’ stele known as ‘The Chief of the
Tribe’ the two figures of the primordial divine couple are set on either side
of the axis of symmetry, underlined by three aligned daggers.
On the left, in the direction of the mountain’s summit,
the Bull God is represented by a full size, rangy male character with a
circular head on a long neck. His arms
are stretched out, his hands are open and his fingers are outspread. He seems to be the result of a corniform
setting; the nose and eyes, the neck and head, the body, the sex.
A large triangular-bladed dagger is stuck in his head,
suggesting a resonant message for the zigzag armed Anthropomorph’s arrow.
On the right, in the direction of the foot of the
mountain the Earth Goddess is symbolised by a tall, 32 square column which must
be sown by the Sky God.
Femme devant le soleil, 1950 (Woman in front of the sun)
The
hook-shaped tufts on the head could be arms and can be interpreted as rising in
prayer. They are antennas aimed towards
the night, picking up any sound, odour or face belonging to a mythical figure
of the same status as the archaic divinities of Mother in Mediterranean
regions. The red sun on the left reflects
a cold and extinguishing light.
Joie d’une fillette devant le soleil, 1960 (The happiness
of a little girl in front of the sun)
‘As for me, a painting must be like
sparks. It must be dazzling like the
beauty of a woman or that of a poem. It
must have a radiance.’ (Joan
Miró)
Miró spread a little white paint which has been rubbed
into a dark background, so that the thin coat of paint gives a bluish effect,
something like a spiral-shaped fog fixed in space.
The large red creature with plier-shaped extensions
inhabits the whole space of the painting, or rather that of the ‘inner space of
the world’ (according to R.M.Rilke). It
tilts to the right towards the large red sun, as if in adoration of the cosmic
forces in place there.
The divine or cosmic couple is undoubtedly present in
Miró’s works, as much in anthropomorphic form as in the symbolism of the
ancient colours.
Indeed, bright red, often used for suns, can mean
‘force’, ‘fire’ or ‘creation’ (Thunderbolt-God), in contrast to green, the
colour of the ‘Mother’s Reason’ (Mother-Goddess) of the material life.
Symbolically this is akin to the dynamics of life; giving
and receiving, becoming and disappearing.
Blue can be interpreted as the colour of the soul, as an
opening towards spiritualism or the subconscious and will be further developed.
(Miró and the sky)
The daggers as symbols of
duality
If we want to look further into the symbolism around the
notion of sacred, we know that the supreme state reached by the initiated leads
to the total abolition of duality and the reunion of opposites and of
oppositions. Now, if we compare the
three most important anthropomorphic engravings of the ‘Vallée des Merveilles’
we notice that the three figures set on three different topographic levels show
duality via three different aspects:
·
On
the lowest rock, the chief of the tribe is subject to the duality expressed by
the opposed daggers which are engraved in the centre of his body
·
In
the median position the sorcerer masters and uses this duality expressed by two
blades emanating from his hands
Inscription à :
Articles (Atom)